فإن قيل: فيكون الكافر مجبورًا في كفره، والفاسق في فسقه، فلا يصح تكليفهما بالإيمان والطاعة؟
It may be objected: would the disbeliever then be compelled in disbelief and the sinner in sin, making their obligation to believe and obey invalid?
The objection assumes that an event's relation to divine will excludes its relation to human choice. If accepted, every morally significant action would become compulsory and accountability would seem meaningless.
The key question is therefore not simply how destiny is defined, but how determination and voluntary agency relate. An act's being brought into existence and its being chosen by a servant must be analyzed as distinct relations.