ومنها إيمان المقلد
One of the disputed questions is the faith of the muqallid.
A muqallid may be a person who accepts a belief on a trusted scholar’s or community’s authority without independently constructing every proof. The problem of the muqallid’s faith does not ask whether evidence is valuable; it asks how correct belief is assessed when systematic demonstration is absent.
Two aspects must be separated: holding a true belief and possessing the ability to explain its formal proof. An inability to present a sophisticated argument does not, by itself, establish an absence of inward conviction. Learning the reasons for belief still has genuine intellectual value.
This is a distinct discussion about faith, understanding, and inference; it should not be confused with takwīn or the morality of actions.