LessonsGreek Philosophy in Arabic: Its Encounter with KalāmQuiz

ومنها القبح والحسن في الأفعال
Another matter is the goodness and badness of human actions.

The debate over ḥusn and qubḥ requires distinguishing what people naturally approve or dislike, what is beneficial or harmful, and what is subject to religious praise, blame, reward, or punishment. Without these distinctions, “reason knows good and evil” remains ambiguous.

For example, truthfulness supports social trust. But “What religious ruling and ultimate accountability attach to an act?” asks an additional question. Ashʿarī and Māturīdī explanations differ in how they assign roles to reason and revelation in these matters.

The dispute is neither simply the complete rejection of reason nor the denial of revelation. A fair comparison identifies the exact domain of moral evaluation and the conditions of religious obligation.

Opening interactive controls...

Moral goodness and badness of acts

Greek Philosophy in Arabic: Its Encounter with Kalām

ومنها القبح والحسن في الأفعال
Another matter is the goodness and badness of human actions.

The debate over ḥusn and qubḥ requires distinguishing what people naturally approve or dislike, what is beneficial or harmful, and what is subject to religious praise, blame, reward, or punishment. Without these distinctions, “reason knows good and evil” remains ambiguous.

For example, truthfulness supports social trust. But “What religious ruling and ultimate accountability attach to an act?” asks an additional question. Ashʿarī and Māturīdī explanations differ in how they assign roles to reason and revelation in these matters.

The dispute is neither simply the complete rejection of reason nor the denial of revelation. A fair comparison identifies the exact domain of moral evaluation and the conditions of religious obligation.