Internal Faculties, Reason and the Five External Senses
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- What is the key dispute concerning the inner faculties?
- What function was assigned to common sense in classical psychology?
- Which classical faculty retains a face after the person leaves?
- What does wahm mean in this historical technical usage?
- How were imagination and memory distinguished?
- What follows from imagining a two-headed person?
- If one faculty can perform multiple tasks, what inference is weakened?
- What does “all are referred back to reason” express?
- What chiefly distinguishes sensory observation from experience?
- Why does one improvement after a remedy not prove a general causal claim?
- Which is the list of the five outward senses?
- What is the characteristic object of hearing?
- Why is the truth of a heard report not guaranteed by hearing?
- What is central to the theological phrase “at that occurrence”?
- Which issue is addressed by “at the cause” versus “through the cause”?
- What does the classical reference to two hollow nerves in the account of sight represent?
- What is correct about seeing color, form, magnitude and motion?
- What helps judge the actual size of a distant object?
- Why does sensing a fragrance not prove a particular flower is present?
- Which element appears in the classical account of taste?
- What is not established directly by tasting sweetness?
- Which qualities are especially associated with touch?
- How does recognizing roughness by sight differ from feeling it by touch?
- What remains affirmed when autonomous sensory efficacy is denied?
- Which example best illustrates the distinction among sense, reason and testimony?
- What may be needed to identify an unobserved cause from a perceived quality?
- The classical division into common sense and compositive faculty is established modern neuroscience.
- Conceiving an object does not necessarily establish its external existence.
- One may recognize customary sensory means while denying their independent efficacy.
- Clearly hearing the words of a report sufficiently proves that it is true.