Punishment, bliss, and questioning in the grave are the central doctrinal claims of this discussion. The texts cited provide transmitted support, while the rational reply is that these states are not intrinsically impossible.
By contrast, questions about which particular child is questioned, which specific sinner is forgiven, or exactly how awareness is created in parts of a deceased body may remain secondary and disputed. These do not automatically carry the same evidentiary weight as the central affirmation.
The doctrine connects human conduct with accountability but does not authorize unsupported judgments about named individuals or fabricated descriptions of an unseen realm.