The discussion establishes several distinctions:
The occurrence of resurrection differs from its modality.
Dispersal of parts does not equal absolute annihilation.
Original components are not identical in status to temporary acquired matter.
The same individual is more than a merely similar individual.
Resurrection is distinct from transmigration.
Each objection must therefore be matched to the particular premise it assumes. The subsequent doctrines of the weighing of deeds, records of actions, and questioning concern this very person who has been raised.