The rational discussion argues that a conclusive proof of impossibility has not been established, especially once place, direction and encompassing are not assumed to be essential to seeing. The transmitted discussion adduces Moses’ request, the Qur’anic description of faces looking toward their Lord, and reports of promised vision.
Each proof has a distinct role: conditionality concerns possibility; promise-verses and Prophetic reports concern occurrence; the verse about eyes not comprehending God raises the reply distinguishing vision from encompassing. The Sunni conclusion affirms vision in the Hereafter without attributing body, limit, location or resemblance to God.