LessonsConditional Particles: In, Idha, Law, and Rhetorical ReframingQuiz

«لَكِنْ أَصْلَ إِنْ عَدَمُ الْجَزْمِ بِوُقُوعِ الشَّرْطِ»
The basic function of in is to avoid definitively presenting the condition as certain to occur.

This is not grammatical jazm, whereby a particle governs a verb’s mood. Here jazm means a speaker’s commitment to the condition’s actual occurrence. Conflating the two senses of the same technical word produces an error.

إِنْ جَاءَ زَيْدٌ أَكْرَمْتُهُ
If Zayd comes, I shall honor him.

The arrival is posited as a condition without being asserted as an event that will definitely take place.

Opening interactive controls...

In: noncommitment to occurrence

Conditional Particles: In, Idha, Law, and Rhetorical Reframing

«لَكِنْ أَصْلَ إِنْ عَدَمُ الْجَزْمِ بِوُقُوعِ الشَّرْطِ»
The basic function of in is to avoid definitively presenting the condition as certain to occur.

This is not grammatical jazm, whereby a particle governs a verb’s mood. Here jazm means a speaker’s commitment to the condition’s actual occurrence. Conflating the two senses of the same technical word produces an error.

إِنْ جَاءَ زَيْدٌ أَكْرَمْتُهُ
If Zayd comes, I shall honor him.

The arrival is posited as a condition without being asserted as an event that will definitely take place.