Why is kināyah not literally the sum “concomitant + antecedent”?
Defining Majāz and Kināyah: Excluding Clues and the Transition to Simile
- Because neither term has meaning
- Because intending the antecedent is permitted, not mandatory and actual in every occurrence
- Because kināyah is a single particular word
- Because a concomitant is always a physical part