Why does the wāw in «وَجَنَّاتٍ وَعُيُونٍ» not contradict faṣl?

Faṣl: Substitution, Quasi-Complete Connection and Quasi-Complete Disjunction

• It is an oath particle
• The wāw has no meaning
• The first clause is deleted
• It coordinates items in the detail, not the main clauses