Why is faṣl used in «ارْحَلْ لَا تُقِيمَنَّ عِنْدَنَا» despite differing forms?
Faṣl: Substitution, Quasi-Complete Connection and Quasi-Complete Disjunction
- The second has no subject
- It always expresses reversal restriction
- Both pursue the same practical end, with the second reinforcing the first
- Commands and prohibitions can never be related