In analyzing quasi-complete connection, one must identify the actual question the earlier clause is understood to raise. It is not necessarily spoken. A surprising event, a compressed account, or a stated judgment may naturally invite a question about explanation, cause, or consequence.
Teaching example: «ظَهَرَ الْحَقُّ، زَالَ الْإِشْكَالُ» (“The truth became clear; the uncertainty disappeared”). In a suitable context the second clause could answer an implied question about the outcome. Without such context, however, an implied question should not be invented for every adjacent pair of clauses.