A central objection asks whether the predication in «كل إنسان» belongs to insān or is reassigned to kull itself.
On one account, kull quantifies over individuals while the human remains the bearer of the predicate. On another, the whole expression is analyzed as though predication were redirected to kull; the critic asks whether the previous attribution survives and how a genuinely new or emphatic meaning emerges.
The controversy concerns the nature of predication, the genitive construction, and the grounds on which reinforcement is claimed—not just the visible order of words.