«إِنَّ مَعَ الْعُسْرِ يُسْرًا»
Surely, with hardship comes ease.
Inna supplies emphasis; maʿa al-ʿusr expresses accompaniment, and yusran is an indefinite noun. The proposition is strong, but the construction does not by itself present an explicit restriction pattern like negation with exception or innamā.
A common analytical error is to treat every preposed phrase as proof of exclusivity. Restriction requires an argument from construction and context, not word order alone.
Opening interactive controls...
«إِنَّ مَعَ الْعُسْرِ يُسْرًا»
Surely, with hardship comes ease.
Inna supplies emphasis; maʿa al-ʿusr expresses accompaniment, and yusran is an indefinite noun. The proposition is strong, but the construction does not by itself present an explicit restriction pattern like negation with exception or innamā.
A common analytical error is to treat every preposed phrase as proof of exclusivity. Restriction requires an argument from construction and context, not word order alone.