Why is «جاء زيد وهو يضحك» not a direct counterexample to the rule on affirmative imperfect circumstances?
Supplementary Practice 1: Applied Analysis of Faṣl, Waṣl, Ījāz and Iṭnāb
- «يضحك» is a past-tense verb
- The wāw introduces a nominal clause beginning with «هو»
- «هو» is a conjunction
- Wāw is always meaningless