Does explaining many implications of «وَلَكُمْ فِي الْقِصَاصِ حَيَاةٌ» prove that all were omitted words?

Supplementary Practice 1: Applied Analysis of Faṣl, Waṣl, Ījāz and Iṭnāb

• Yes; every explanation reconstructs omitted text
• No; explaining implications differs from restoring ellipsis
• The verse has no meaning without expansion
• It is only tadhyīl