What is wrong with inferring that “the difference is only in wording” excludes all possible mistakes?
Supplementary Practice 10: Rhetoric of Claim, Evidence, Objection and Reply
- It treats innamā as incapable of restriction
- It mistakes al-khilāf for an imperative verb
- It extends a context-specific restriction into an unsupported universal denial
- It makes al-ṣiyāgha indefinite