How does faṣl differ between “inna al-ʿamala mutqan. Innahu muḥkam” and “taʾakhkhara al-ʿamalu. Ishtadda al-maṭaru”?

Supplementary Practice 12: Rhetorical Evidence, Competing Analyses and Reasoned Revision

• The first omits a condition; the second reverses a restriction
• The first reinforces a judgment; the second answers a causal question
• Both invariably exemplify complete disjunction
• The first has circumstantial wāw; the second an oath wāw