قُدِّمَ أَصْحَابُ الْحَاجَةِ الْعَاجِلَةِ، لَا لِأَنَّهُمْ أَفْضَلُ مِنْ غَيْرِهِمْ، بَلْ لِأَنَّ التَّأْخِيرَ يَشُقُّ عَلَيْهِمْ.
Those with urgent needs were served first—not because they were better than others, but because delay would burden them more.
The initial report could imply personal superiority for the favored group. The negative qualification blocks that unintended reading, while the adversative clause supplies the actual reason. Preventing this misinterpretation is the distinctive function of iḥtirās.
Without the protective phrase, the preference might be mistaken for a judgment of personal rank. Stating the reason openly distinguishes urgency of need from superiority of status.