Every applied judgment should answer three questions: (1) What is the underlying proposition? (2) Which misconception or communicative need is being addressed? (3) Exactly which aspect of meaning changes with the chosen form? Naming a device alone is insufficient; the analyst must identify the altered relation and its contextual warrant.
ChangeAnalytical question
Plain → emphatic reportWhat claim was doubted?
Report → restrictionWhich alternative was excluded?
Expression → ellipsisWhat clue preserves the missing sense?
Plain report → expansionWhat benefit does the addition provide?
If competing interpretations remain equally supported, explain the alternatives and their evidence. Rhetorical scholarship does not gain accuracy by inventing certainty.