How should the “claim accompanied by evidence” comparison be understood?
Taʿrīḍ, Talwīḥ, Ramz, Īmāʾ and Ishārah; the Rhetorical Force of Figurative Speech
- As a statutory standard of legal testimony
- As proof that all ash implies generosity
- As proof that literal wording is prohibited
- As rhetorical supporting indication, not invariably conclusive proof