Which statement preserves the closing homicide/settlement qualification?
Ada and Qada: The Required Act and Its Substitute
- The accidental-case payment is compulsory in intentional killing without a separate settlement agreement
- The perpetrator’s willingness to pay suffices, even when the heirs do not accept settlement
- Settlement requires voluntary payment and the heirs’ choice to accept it instead of Qisas
- The heirs’ wish for payment alone makes the perpetrator’s agreement unnecessary in this example