LessonsAdvance-Purchase Sale (سَلَم): Availability, Delivery Time and Financing UseQuiz

The Hanafi position discussed here requires the Salam commodity to remain available in the market from the contract date until delivery. The concern is practical certainty: the seller should not promise something that disappears from ordinary supply during the contract period.

The Shafi‘i, Maliki and Hanbali positions described do not require availability on the contract date; what matters is that the commodity be available when delivery becomes due. The latter view is presented as adoptable in modern circumstances.

Opening interactive controls...

Advance-Purchase Sale (سَلَم): Availability, Delivery Time and Financing Use

Understand the juristic differences, then see how Salam can finance real economic activity Read the bilingual lesson for Advance-Purchase Sale (سَلَم): Availability, Delivery Time and Financing Use and test your understanding with a focused quiz.

Lesson

1. One Area of Difference: Must the Commodity Stay Available?

The Hanafi position discussed here requires the Salam commodity to remain available in the market from the contract date until delivery. The concern is practical certainty: the seller should not promise something that disappears from ordinary supply during the contract period.

The Shafi‘i, Maliki and Hanbali positions described do not require availability on the contract date; what matters is that the commodity be available when delivery becomes due. The latter view is presented as adoptable in modern circumstances.

2. Another Difference: Is There a Minimum Delivery Period?

The Hanafi and Hanbali view discussed sets a minimum of about one month. The Maliki view mentioned requires at least about fifteen days. Their reasoning is that Salam was meant to give producers meaningful time and that a real time gap may affect pricing.

Other jurists, including Imam al-Shafi‘i and some Hanafi jurists, do not impose a fixed minimum. Their focus is that the delivery date must simply be clearly known.

3. Why the Shorter-Period View Can Fit Modern Trade

The source discussion prefers the view that no universal minimum period should be imposed today. Markets, logistics and seller needs differ across places and times. A period useful to a farmer in one market may be unnecessarily long in another transaction.

The key safeguard remains certainty of the delivery date and genuine free agreement between the parties.

4. Salam as Agricultural Financing

Salam naturally fits agriculture because the farmer often needs money before the crop is ready. A financial institution can pay in advance for clearly specified produce and receive the commodity later.

The institution's potential profit comes from buying through Salam at an agreed advance price and later selling the delivered commodity in the market—not from charging interest on money advanced.

5. How the Buyer Can Protect Delivery Risk

The buyer/financier may ask for security to support the seller's delivery obligation. This may include a guarantee, mortgage or hypothecation.

If the seller defaults, a guarantor may be required to provide the agreed commodity. Where valid collateral exists, it may be realized so the buyer can obtain the commodity from the market or recover the advance price.

6. The Practical Challenge for Modern Banks

In Salam, the bank receives commodities—not merely cash repayments. A financial institution accustomed only to money may find storage, quality control and resale operationally difficult.

But this difficulty is part of the deeper shift in Islamic finance: halal commercial profit requires exposure to real trade and assets. A bank using Salam may therefore need a specialized commodity unit to handle receipt and resale.

7. Why the Bank Cannot Sell Before Receiving the Commodity

Even though the bank already has a contractual right to receive the Salam goods, it does not yet possess them. It therefore cannot simply sell those same goods as if they were already in its possession.

This rule prevents Salam from becoming paper trading of undelivered goods. A later resale must respect possession rules unless a separate valid structure—such as parallel Salam—is used.

8. The Big Picture

Salam is not a device for creating a fixed return on cash. It is financing through a real purchase: the financier pays now, becomes entitled to real goods later, and bears the commercial task of receiving and disposing of those goods.

That asset connection is what makes Salam fundamentally different from an interest-bearing loan.

Practice questions

Question 1

What does the Hanafi availability condition discussed require?

  • The Salam commodity remains available in the market from contract to delivery
  • The seller must own the exact goods on day one
  • The buyer must store the goods immediately
  • The commodity must be imported

Question 2

All jurists mentioned agree on one fixed minimum Salam period.

  • True
  • False

Question 3

Where does the financier's Salam profit come from?

  • Commercial purchase and later sale of the commodity
  • Interest charged on the advance
  • Late-payment penalties
  • A guaranteed fee unrelated to goods

Question 4

Why may a bank need a commodity unit for Salam?

  • It must receive, inspect and sell real commodities
  • Salam deals only in cash
  • The seller becomes a bank employee
  • Storage is forbidden

Question 5

A bank may simply sell the same Salam goods before receiving them because it has a contractual right to them.

  • True
  • False

Question 6

What may security in Salam support?

  • The seller's obligation to deliver the agreed commodity
  • A guaranteed bank interest return
  • A variable commodity specification
  • The buyer's right to change quantity later

Open the interactive quiz