The main comparison is:
Abu Hanifah — an adult, free and sane safih's sale generally remains effective; property withheld at maturity because of absent rushd is delivered on reaching 25.
Abu Yusuf and Muhammad — financial interdiction is permissible; the interdicted person's sale needs a valid basis such as judicial approval when beneficial; property remains withheld until rushd is demonstrated.
The key analytical lesson is that adulthood, delivery of assets and legal effectiveness of a sale are three distinct questions.
Opening interactive controls...
A concise comparison of the three Hanafi positions
Kitab al-Hajr: Improvidence, Legal Restriction, and the Age of 25
The main comparison is:
Abu Hanifah — an adult, free and sane safih's sale generally remains effective; property withheld at maturity because of absent rushd is delivered on reaching 25.
Abu Yusuf and Muhammad — financial interdiction is permissible; the interdicted person's sale needs a valid basis such as judicial approval when beneficial; property remains withheld until rushd is demonstrated.
The key analytical lesson is that adulthood, delivery of assets and legal effectiveness of a sale are three distinct questions.