Strict grammatical analogy would keep 100 unspecified because wa connects distinct expressions rather than directly defining one. Hanafi istiḥsān instead recognizes how commonly currency amounts were expressed in practice.
Thus the hundred is also in dirhams. This is an interpretation grounded in established financial speech, not a license to assign arbitrary units.
Opening interactive controls...
Analogy versus juristic preference
Kitab al-Iqrar: Conjoined Amounts, Divine-Will Clauses, and Options
Strict grammatical analogy would keep 100 unspecified because wa connects distinct expressions rather than directly defining one. Hanafi istiḥsān instead recognizes how commonly currency amounts were expressed in practice.
Thus the hundred is also in dirhams. This is an interpretation grounded in established financial speech, not a license to assign arbitrary units.