Murabahah and Tawliyah: Cost, Profit and Misstatement

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• Which arrangement defines murabahah?
• What is the distinctive profit rule for tawliyah?
• Cloth is bought for Rs 7,500 and resold with the cost disclosed plus Rs 1,500 profit. Identify the sale.
• Compared with ordinary sale, which representation is central to murabahah?
• Under Quduri’s basic rule, what quality is required of the first consideration?
• What is wrong with calling an exchange for a unique antique a “Rs 30,000 cash purchase” without further grounds?
• Why can qualifying cloth finishing and dyeing fees be included in cost?
• With original price Rs 6,000, dyeing Rs 500, and embroidery Rs 700, what is the qualifying accumulated cost?
• What does tiraz refer to in this discussion?
• Grain cost Rs 30,000 to buy and Rs 2,000 to transport. Which statement is accurate?
• What does “qama alayya bi-kadha” appropriately express?
• The first price is Rs 10,000 and later dyeing costs Rs 1,000. Which statement is false?
• Why should ordinary business overhead not automatically be added to the represented original price?
• Purchase Rs 8,000; allowable costs Rs 1,000; stated profit Rs 900. What is the final price?
• Why are an expensive sale and proven cost misstatement different issues?
• Under Abu Hanifah, what happens if the disclosed first cost in murabahah proves false?
• Murabahah: stated cost Rs 1,000, 20% profit, true cost Rs 800. Under Abu Hanifah, if the buyer affirms the sale, what is payable?
• Tawliyah falsely states Rs 1,000 as the first price although the actual price was Rs 900. Under Abu Hanifah, what price results?
• In which two forms does Abu Yusuf deduct the dishonest amount?
• Cost was stated as Rs 1,000 and a 20% markup yielded Rs 1,200; true cost is Rs 800. What is Abu Yusuf’s proportionately corrected price?
• In the same Abu Yusuf example, what total amount is deducted from Rs 1,200?
• According to the commentary, what remedy does Muhammad allow despite “la yahuttu fihima”?
• What is the central difference between Muhammad and Abu Yusuf on dishonest pricing?
• On dishonesty in murabahah, what outcome do Abu Hanifah and Muhammad share?
• In tawliyah, which outcome is shared by Abu Hanifah and Abu Yusuf?
• When does the particular option related to dishonest first-cost disclosure arise?
• When a buyer has a return option but later makes return impossible, what is the general apparent-rule consequence noted by the commentary?
• Cloth originally cost Rs 35,000 with Rs 5,000 in qualifying later expenses. What is the correct pair?
• First price Rs 10,000, dyeing Rs 700, and warehouse rent of Rs 300 solely for safeguarding the goods. Under the commentary’s stated distinction, what is the allowable accumulated cost?
• How should a cost-plus sale offer be audited?