Rescission by Agreement: Original Price and Loss of Goods

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• What is iqalah?
• What is the rule for consent in iqalah?
• At what price is iqalah permitted in Quduri?
• For iqalah of a Rs 50,000 sale, what is the governing refund?
• What of a Rs 5,000 increase stipulated within iqalah?
• If a smaller refund is stipulated within iqalah, what follows?
• What does “fa-l-shart batil” invalidate?
• How does iqalah relate to a sale?
• How does an option for defect differ from iqalah?
• Who are “al-mutaʿaqidayn”?
• Under Abu Hanifah, how is iqalah classified for the parties?
• How can iqalah be classified for affected third-party rights?
• What does “fi qawl Abi Hanifah” attribute?
• What does shufʿah illustrate here?
• Does every neighbour automatically have pre-emption after iqalah?
• What baseline characterization is attributed to Abu Yusuf in commentary?
• What baseline characterization is attributed to Muhammad in commentary?
• If the seller spent the original banknotes, what of iqalah?
• What does “thaman” denote here?
• Does losing the original money cancel the refund obligation?
• What happens if the sold object is fully destroyed?
• Why does loss of cash differ from loss of the item?
• If an identified machine is destroyed by fire, is ordinary iqalah possible?
• What does Quduri say if part of the goods was lost?
• Ten identical glasses: three destroyed. What can be rescinded?
• Ten equal-price glasses cost Rs 1,000; seven remain. What simple allocation applies?
• Is every scratch “halak al-mabiʿ”?
• Does substituting a new item automatically constitute iqalah of destroyed original goods?
• Which chapter follows Bab al-Iqalah?
• Which set summarizes the chapter’s three principal themes?
• Why refund the original Rs 50,000 rather than the stipulated Rs 45,000 in iqalah?