Al-Kināyāt — Kam, its Tamyīz and Syntactic Positions

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• Which four words are listed as kināyāt in the source?
• What is the central function of interrogative kam?
• What is rajulan in «كَمْ رَجُلًا عِنْدَكَ؟»?
• What does declarative kam primarily convey?
• Case of mālin in «كَمْ مَالٍ أَنْفَقْتَهُ!»?
• How may the tamyīz of declarative kam appear in the book?
• What is hum in «كَمْ رِجَالٍ لَقِيتُهُمْ!»?
• Case of the tamyīz in «كَمْ رَجُلًا لَقِيتَ؟»?
• Why is rajulin genitive in «كَمْ مِنْ رَجُلٍ»?
• Can min be used with both kinds of kam?
• What tamyīz does the source supply for «كَمْ ضَرَبْتَ؟»?
• When does the source allow a tamyīz to be omitted?
• What is the syntactic position of kam in «كَمْ رَجُلًا ضَرَبْتَ؟»?
• What function does kam have in «كَمْ ضَرْبَةً ضَرَبْتَ؟»?
• What does kam express in «كَمْ يَوْمًا سِرْتَ؟»?
• What is the fixed ending of kam?
• Position of kam in «بِكَمْ رَجُلًا مَرَرْتَ؟»?
• Syntactic role of kam in «غُلَامَ كَمْ رَجُلًا ضَرَبْتَ؟»?
• Role of rajulan in «غُلَامَ كَمْ رَجُلًا»?
• Why is kam not the direct object in «كَمْ رَجُلٍ ضَرَبْتَهُ»?
• How does the source classify kam in «كَمْ رَجُلًا أَخُوكَ»?
• Function of kam in «كَمْ يَوْمًا سَفَرُكَ؟»?
• Why is shahrin genitive in «كَمْ شَهْرٍ صَوْمِي»?
• What do kayta and dhayta stand for?
• What does kadhā represent in the source?
• In which example is kam in the genitive position?
• In which example does kam function as a time adverbial?
• What is the key distinction between kam and its tamyīz?
• What is rajulin after min?
• What is ḍarbatan in «كَمْ ضَرْبَةً ضَرَبْتَ»?
• Which tamyīz is shown after declarative kam?
• Which example has kam as the predicate?
• Which use of kam expresses abundance?
• Why does the book show a plural tamyīz with declarative kam?
• Does an accusative rajulan always have to be an object?
• Which expression contrasts with kayta and dhayta in function?
• What is the next textbook chapter after kināyāt?
• What is ghulāma in «غُلَامَ كَمْ رَجُلًا»?
• Why is kam nominative-position in «كَمْ رِجَالٍ لَقِيتُهُمْ»?
• Which source example shows an omitted tamyīz?
• Kam is always interrogative.
• Mālin is genitive in «كَمْ مَالٍ أَنْفَقْتَهُ».
• Rajul after min in «كَمْ مِنْ رَجُلٍ» is accusative.
• The book permits omitting tamyīz when context is sufficient.
• Kam is the subject of «كَمْ رَجُلًا ضَرَبْتَ».
• Kam counts occurrences of the action in «كَمْ ضَرْبَةً ضَرَبْتَ».
• Rajulan must become genitive in «بِكَمْ رَجُلًا».
• Kam is the genitive complement in «غُلَامَ كَمْ رَجُلًا».
• The source calls kam an object in «كَمْ يَوْمًا سَفَرُكَ».
• Hum is an object pronoun in «كَمْ رِجَالٍ لَقِيتُهُمْ».
• Kayta and dhayta denote exact numerals.
• Kam can occupy different syntactic case positions while remaining indeclinable.