Causes of Diptote Status — Femininity and Its Conditions
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- When does feminine tāʾ prevent full declension according to the book?
- Which two causes make Ṭalḥah a diptote?
- Why does Ṭalḥah take fatḥa after بِ in this phrase?
- Why is مَدْرَسَةٌ ordinarily fully declinable?
- What kind of femininity occurs in Zaynab?
- What is the syntactic role of Zaynab in جَاءَتْ زَيْنَبُ?
- Which conditions jointly permit the two declensions of Hind?
- What is the status of مَرَرْتُ بِهِنْدٍ?
- Why is Hind marked with fatḥa in this alternative genitive?
- Why does Zaynab not receive Hind’s optional treatment?
- What is true of the middle letter in Saqar?
- Which condition is illustrated by Māh and Jūr?
- Which feminine ending occurs in ḥublā?
- Which feminine ending occurs in ḥamrāʾ?
- What further condition is required for ḥublā and ḥamrāʾ to be diptotes?
- What is ḥamrāʾ in هٰذِهِ وَرْدَةٌ حَمْرَاءُ?
- Why does ḥamrāʾ end in fatḥa after ilā?
- Why is the case vowel not visible on ḥublā?
- What is correct about the final ى in فَتًى?
- What marks the genitive of madrasah in this sentence?
- What does “alif stands in place of two causes” mean?
- What is Ṭalḥah’s grammatical role in رأيت طلحة?
- Which parsing of بِزَيْنَبَ is correct?
- Which is the key point about Hind?
- How is ḥublā marked in the genitive when not with al-/iḍāfa?
- What marks the nominative of ḥamrāʾ?
- Every noun ending with tāʾ marbūṭa is necessarily a diptote.
- Ṭalḥah may be a diptote even though it is a male name.
- Zaynab has semantic femininity without final feminine tāʾ.
- Both هِنْدٍ and هِنْدَ can be valid genitive readings under the book’s conditions.
- Saqar qualifies for Hind’s special treatment because its middle consonant is silent.
- Ḥamrāʾ can be genitive even when its visible ending is fatḥa.
- Ḥublā is indeclinable simply because its case vowels are estimated.
- Proper-name status is necessary for diptotes with feminine alif maqṣūra or mamdūda.