Conditional Particles: In, Law and Ammā

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• How many conditional particles are named in this chapter?
• Which is the correct set of the source’s three conditional particles?
• Role of tadrus in إِنْ تَدْرُسْ تَنْجَحْ?
• Role of tanjaḥ in the same example?
• Mood of the two imperfect verbs with in?
• Case of Zaydun in إِنْ يَكْتُبْ زَيْدٌ?
• Jussive sign on tajtahidū after in?
• Jussive sign of tadʿu in إِنْ تَدْعُ اللَّهَ?
• What does the source say when in precedes a past form?
• Morphological form of both verbs in in akramtanī akramtuka?
• Which expression suits expected sunrise in the source contrast?
• What does the source assume in إِنْ أَنْتَ زَائِرِي?
• Best textbook reconstruction?
• What is required after in and law?
• Dominant time reference of law in this chapter?
• What is tazūrunī morphologically?
• Does law make tajtahidu jussive?
• Function of lām in la-fasadatā?
• Where is the cited law verse found?
• Type of law in Qurʾān 21:22?
• Grammatical role of the final alif in la-fasadatā?
• Is law absolutely limited to past reference?
• When an oath precedes a condition, what governs the overt response form?
• Wāw in wa-llāhi in the oath example?
• Case of Allāhi in wa-llāhi?
• How many possible answer analyses with an intervening oath?
• Nūn at the end of la-ātiyannaka?
• Mood of ātika in the conditional-answer construction?
• Basic purpose of ammā in the book?
• Role of fāʾ in ammā Zaydun fa-munṭaliqun?
• Case of Zaydun after ammā?
• Role of munṭaliqun in ammā Zaydun fa-munṭaliqun?
• Which are the three features of conditional ammā?
• Which particle appears in the source’s reconstruction of ammā?
• Function of yawma after ammā?
• Which item governs yawma in the source’s analysis?
• Why is every noun after ammā not automatically mubtadaʾ?
• Main distinction between ammā and immā?
• Which of in and inna is jussive conditional?
• Why is al-ʿilma accusative in inna l-ʿilma nāfiʿun?
• Which conditional expression is used here?
• How is tasʿa jussive in إِنْ تَسْعَ تَبْلُغْ?
• Jussive sign of tabluġ?
• Which contains ammā’s required response fāʾ?
• Why not insist every response with an intervening oath is jussive?
• Why is Zayd nominative after ammā?
• Which best summarizes the chapter?
• The source counts in, law and ammā as its three conditional particles.
• Both imperfects are jussive in in tadrus tanjaḥ.
• Conditional in necessarily makes the following subject accusative.
• In with a past-form verb can still express a future condition.
• The textbook treats in and idhā as interchangeable in every context.
• Anta is a past verb in in anta zāʾirī.
• In and law require a verb expressed or understood.
• Law itself makes the imperfect verb jussive.
• The textbook’s core law construction is past counterfactual.
• An imperfect after law must indicate future time.
• Law kāna fīhimā ālihatun ... la-fasadatā is a Qurʾānic example.
• The dual alif in la-fasadatā is a subject pronoun.
• With an initial oath the overt answer follows oath-response rules.
• With an intervening oath, either answer analysis may occur.
• In wa-llāhi, wāw marks the oath and Allāh is genitive.
• The response to conditional ammā requires no fāʾ.
• Zaydun is mubtadaʾ in ammā Zaydun fa-munṭaliqun.
• Yawma is a nominative mubtadaʾ after ammā.
• The textbook derives ammā using mahmā yakun min shayʾin.
• Ammā and immā are the same particle with two pronunciations.
• In and inna differ in meaning and governance.
• All three source particles have identical grammatical governance.
• Every noun after ammā must be a mubtadaʾ.
• The distinction of past form and future conditional meaning is central to in.
• If two verbs are jussive, their subject nouns are jussive too.