Ism al-Tafḍīl: Formation, Comparison, Agreement and Parsing
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- What does ism al-tafḍīl fundamentally indicate?
- Who is the preferred entity?
- Who is the comparator?
- Usual masculine pattern of the elative?
- The corresponding feminine pattern?
- What source verb normally allows direct formation?
- What is aḥmar in this chapter?
- Textbook comparison for redness?
- Case and role of istikhrājan?
- Syntactic role of ʿarajan?
- How are khayr and sharr used here?
- How many main uses does the book list?
- Which use is this?
- Fill the elative before min with feminine subject.
- Fill before min with a dual subject.
- Fill before min with plural feminine subject.
- Why is Khālidin genitive?
- Why is al-fuḍlā feminine?
- What is the form of the definite elative?
- Which agreement is illustrated?
- Which expression follows the standard rule?
- Case of al-qawmi in the iḍāfah?
- Permitted form with definite iḍāfah and dual subject?
- Why does the dual elative lack nūn?
- Which element is deleted here?
- When is the feminine agreeing iḍāfah valid?
- Why is afḍal singular here?
- Correct elative with an indefinite plural-feminine complement?
- Where is agreement obligatory?
- Which setting allows both agreement and invariant form?
- Syntactic position of afḍal?
- Parse afḍala after rajulin.
- Why is al-afḍali genitive with kasrah?
- Why genitive kasrah on afḍali here?
- What case is fuḍlā as predicate?
- What is al-afḍal in this sentence?
- Which word is the predicate?
- What subject does an elative normally govern?
- What is the syntax of Zayd?
- What is al-kuḥlu in the exceptional example?
- Why is aḥsana accusative there?
- Antecedent of -hu in minhu?
- Where is the negation in the technical example?
- What is ʿilman?
- Which shows an omitted comparator understood by context?
- Which overall rule is correct?
- Which example loses nūn through iḍāfah?
- Is invariant afḍal allowed in definite iḍāfah for a woman?
- Why not label ʿilman as a direct object here?
- Both form and comparative meaning matter.
- Every augmented triliteral forms afʿal directly by regular analogy.
- Istikhrājan is accusative.
- Khayr cannot be an elative without visible hamzah.
- Hindun afḍalu min Khālidin is regular.
- Dual afḍalāni before min is regular.
- With al the elative agrees in gender and number.
- In definite iḍāfah the elative must always be invariant.
- The dual nūn is removed due to iḍāfah.
- Indefinite iḍāfah requires feminine elative agreement.
- Afḍal is normally diptote.
- Al-afḍali with kasrah is correct.
- Zayd is the elative’s overt subject.
- Al-kuḥlu is nominative subject in the kohl example.
- Every elative freely governs an overt subject.
- Fuḍlā has estimated nominative ḍamma.
- Al-afḍalu min Khālid is the regular taught comparative.