The Predicate of Inna and Its Sisters
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- Role of «زَيْدًا» in «إِنَّ زَيْدًا قَائِمٌ»?
- Which word is the khabar in «إِنَّ زَيْدًا قَائِمٌ»?
- How many particles are in the inna group including inna?
- Case of «مُجْتَهِدٌ»?
- Whole predicate in «إِنَّ زَيْدًا أَبُوهُ قَائِمٌ»?
- Antecedent of «ـهُ» in «أَبُوهُ»?
- Subject of the verb «يَقْرَأُ»?
- Why is «الدَّارِ» genitive?
- Role of «زَيْدًا» in source example with fronting?
- Can ordinary «قَائِمٌ» be fronted before the ism of inna under the source rule?
- Fronted predicate in the desk example?
- Function of «عِنْدَ»?
- Accusative marker of dual «الطَّالِبَيْنِ»?
- Nominative marker of dual «نَاجِحَانِ»?
- Accusative marker of sound feminine plural «الْمُعَلِّمَاتِ»?
- Which particle expresses comparison?
- Meaning of «لَيْتَ»?
- What does «لَعَلَّ» convey here?
- Role of «السَّفَرَ»?
- Meaning of a clausal khabar being “in the nominative syntactic position”?
- Correct inna-construction of «زَيْدٌ قَائِمٌ»?
- Which ordering is licensed by the source’s locative exception?
- Inna is a noun and takes nominative case.
- The khabar in «إِنَّ زَيْدًا قَائِمٌ» is nominative.
- In the source’s fronted example, Zayd is a direct object of a verb.
- The khabar inna can be an entire nominal clause.
- In the dual example one noun is accusative and the other nominative.
- Every ism inna must show a visible fatḥa.
- Layta and la-alla differ in meaning, but both govern an accusative ism.
- Fronting a locative predicate removes the accusative case of ism inna.