LessonsNarrator Criticism: Al-Mughīrah b. Saʿīd, Shaqīq and Jābir al-JuʿfīQuiz

وَحَدَّثَنِي سَلَمَةُ بْنُ شَبِيبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا الْحُمَيْدِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَجُلًا سَأَلَ جَابِرًا عَنْ قَوْلِهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ: «فَلَنْ أَبْرَحَ الْأَرْضَ حَتَّى يَأْذَنَ لِي أَبِي أَوْ يَحْكُمَ اللَّهُ لِي وَهُوَ خَيْرُ الْحَاكِمِينَ»، فَقَالَ جَابِرٌ: لَمْ يَجِئْ تَأْوِيلُ هَذِهِ. قَالَ سُفْيَانُ: وَكَذَبَ.
Translation: Through Salamah b. Shabīb, al-Ḥumaydī and Sufyān: A man asked Jābir about Qurʾān 12:80, “I shall not leave this land until my father permits me or Allah decides for me; He is the best of judges.” Jābir said its realization had not yet arrived. Sufyān said: “He lied.”

The verse belongs to the account of Joseph’s brothers, one of whom resolves to remain in Egypt. The issue is Jābir’s claim that the verse awaits a future fulfillment; the following passage supplies Sufyān’s reason for rejecting that interpretation. The forceful «وَكَذَبَ» is his reported criticism, not independent proof of Jābir’s conscious intent to deceive.

Opening interactive controls...

The disputed application of Qurʾān 12:80

Narrator Criticism: Al-Mughīrah b. Saʿīd, Shaqīq and Jābir al-Juʿfī

وَحَدَّثَنِي سَلَمَةُ بْنُ شَبِيبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا الْحُمَيْدِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَجُلًا سَأَلَ جَابِرًا عَنْ قَوْلِهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ: «فَلَنْ أَبْرَحَ الْأَرْضَ حَتَّى يَأْذَنَ لِي أَبِي أَوْ يَحْكُمَ اللَّهُ لِي وَهُوَ خَيْرُ الْحَاكِمِينَ»، فَقَالَ جَابِرٌ: لَمْ يَجِئْ تَأْوِيلُ هَذِهِ. قَالَ سُفْيَانُ: وَكَذَبَ.
Translation: Through Salamah b. Shabīb, al-Ḥumaydī and Sufyān: A man asked Jābir about Qurʾān 12:80, “I shall not leave this land until my father permits me or Allah decides for me; He is the best of judges.” Jābir said its realization had not yet arrived. Sufyān said: “He lied.”

The verse belongs to the account of Joseph’s brothers, one of whom resolves to remain in Egypt. The issue is Jābir’s claim that the verse awaits a future fulfillment; the following passage supplies Sufyān’s reason for rejecting that interpretation. The forceful «وَكَذَبَ» is his reported criticism, not independent proof of Jābir’s conscious intent to deceive.