فَهُمْ وَإِنْ كَانُوا -كَمَا وَصَفْنَا مِنَ الْعِلْمِ وَالسَّتْرِ عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ- مَعْرُوفِينَ فَغَيْرُهُمْ مِنْ أَقْرَانِهِمْ مِمَّنْ عِنْدَهُمْ مَا ذَكَرْنَا مِنَ الْإِتْقَانِ وَالِاسْتِقَامَةِ فِي الرِّوَايَةِ يَفْضُلُونَهُمْ فِي الْحَالِ وَالْمَرْتَبَةِ لِأَنَّ هَذَا عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ دَرَجَةٌ رَفِيعَةٌ وَخَصْلَةٌ سَنِيَّةٌ
Translation: As already described regarding their learning and respectable standing, these transmitters were known among scholars. Nevertheless, contemporaries possessing the stated precision and consistency in narration ranked above them, since that is a distinguished quality in hadith scholarship.
Truthfulness, retention, and precision are related but distinct. A narrator may be honest yet fail to preserve every report with the accuracy of a stronger peer. Fair criticism recognizes his good character without overlooking real limitations in transmission.