Two pupils report from a well-known teacher. One has a substantial established record of agreement with accurate peers, so a well-supported unique addition may be accepted. The other has no demonstrable participation in the teacher’s well-known sound reports but produces many otherwise unknown narrations; he cannot simply receive the same presumption.
Uniqueness alone does not decide the case. The transmitter’s verified precision and the evidence surrounding the particular addition do.
Opening interactive controls...
Rejected Reports, Recognizing Munkar, and Evaluating Narrator Additions
Two pupils report from a well-known teacher. One has a substantial established record of agreement with accurate peers, so a well-supported unique addition may be accepted. The other has no demonstrable participation in the teacher’s well-known sound reports but produces many otherwise unknown narrations; he cannot simply receive the same presumption.
Uniqueness alone does not decide the case. The transmitter’s verified precision and the evidence surrounding the particular addition do.