LessonsRejected Reports, Recognizing Munkar, and Evaluating Narrator AdditionsQuiz

وَمَنْ نَحَا نَحْوَهُمْ فِي رِوَايَةِ الْمُنْكَرِ مِنَ الْحَدِيثِ، فَلَسْنَا نُعَرِّجُ عَلَى حَدِيثِهِمْ وَلَا نَتَشَاغَلُ بِهِ
Translation: As for those who follow the same course in transmitting anomalous reports, we do not turn to their reports, nor do we occupy ourselves with them.

The rationale follows: acceptance of a narrator’s otherwise singular report depends in part on what his established transmission shows about his accuracy. Thus rejection is grounded in a criterion, not merely in a list of names.

Opening interactive controls...

Exclusion of comparable transmitters

Rejected Reports, Recognizing Munkar, and Evaluating Narrator Additions

وَمَنْ نَحَا نَحْوَهُمْ فِي رِوَايَةِ الْمُنْكَرِ مِنَ الْحَدِيثِ، فَلَسْنَا نُعَرِّجُ عَلَى حَدِيثِهِمْ وَلَا نَتَشَاغَلُ بِهِ
Translation: As for those who follow the same course in transmitting anomalous reports, we do not turn to their reports, nor do we occupy ourselves with them.

The rationale follows: acceptance of a narrator’s otherwise singular report depends in part on what his established transmission shows about his accuracy. Thus rejection is grounded in a criterion, not merely in a list of names.