LessonsThe Meeting Condition in Muʿanʿan Hadith: Muslim’s Rejoinder and Route ComparisonQuiz

فَإِذَا كَانَتِ الْعِلَّةُ عِنْدَ مَنْ وَصَفْنَا قَوْلَهُ مِنْ قَبْلُ فِي فَسَادِ الْحَدِيثِ وَتَوْهِينِهِ إِذَا لَمْ يُعْلَمْ أَنَّ الرَّاوِيَ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِمَّنْ رَوَى عَنْهُ شَيْئًا إِمْكَانَ الْإِرْسَالِ فِيهِ، لَزِمَهُ تَرْكُ الِاحْتِجَاجِ فِي قِيَادِ قَوْلِهِ بِرِوَايَةِ مَنْ يُعْلَمُ أَنَّهُ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِمَّنْ رَوَى عَنْهُ إِلَّا فِي نَفْسِ الْخَبَرِ الَّذِي فِيهِ ذِكْرُ السَّمَاعِ، لِمَا بَيَّنَّا مِنْ قَبْلُ عَنِ الْأَئِمَّةِ الَّذِينَ نَقَلُوا الْأَخْبَارَ أَنَّهُمْ كَانَتْ لَهُمْ تَارَاتٌ يُرْسِلُونَ فِيهَا الْحَدِيثَ إِرْسَالًا وَلَا يَذْكُرُونَ مَنْ سَمِعُوهُ مِنْهُ، وَتَارَاتٌ يَنْشَطُونَ فِيهَا فَيُسْنِدُونَ الْخَبَرَ عَلَى هَيْئَةِ مَا سَمِعُوا فَيُخْبِرُونَ بِالنُّزُولِ فِيهِ إِنْ نَزَلُوا وَبِالصُّعُودِ إِنْ صَعِدُوا، كَمَا شَرَحْنَا ذَلِكَ عَنْهُمْ.
Translation: If the sole reason for rejecting a report without documented prior hearing is the possible omission of a link, the same reasoning would compel rejection even where the narrator is known to have heard from the teacher—except in a report explicitly stating its own hearing. Trustworthy scholars sometimes give abbreviated or fuller chains, with higher and lower routes.

This exposes the inconsistency of treating bare possibility as uniformly disqualifying while exempting cases of known general hearing. It does not assert that all trustworthy narrators actually omit links at every point.

Opening interactive controls...

Muslim’s Conclusion from the Route Evidence

The Meeting Condition in Muʿanʿan Hadith: Muslim’s Rejoinder and Route Comparison

فَإِذَا كَانَتِ الْعِلَّةُ عِنْدَ مَنْ وَصَفْنَا قَوْلَهُ مِنْ قَبْلُ فِي فَسَادِ الْحَدِيثِ وَتَوْهِينِهِ إِذَا لَمْ يُعْلَمْ أَنَّ الرَّاوِيَ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِمَّنْ رَوَى عَنْهُ شَيْئًا إِمْكَانَ الْإِرْسَالِ فِيهِ، لَزِمَهُ تَرْكُ الِاحْتِجَاجِ فِي قِيَادِ قَوْلِهِ بِرِوَايَةِ مَنْ يُعْلَمُ أَنَّهُ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِمَّنْ رَوَى عَنْهُ إِلَّا فِي نَفْسِ الْخَبَرِ الَّذِي فِيهِ ذِكْرُ السَّمَاعِ، لِمَا بَيَّنَّا مِنْ قَبْلُ عَنِ الْأَئِمَّةِ الَّذِينَ نَقَلُوا الْأَخْبَارَ أَنَّهُمْ كَانَتْ لَهُمْ تَارَاتٌ يُرْسِلُونَ فِيهَا الْحَدِيثَ إِرْسَالًا وَلَا يَذْكُرُونَ مَنْ سَمِعُوهُ مِنْهُ، وَتَارَاتٌ يَنْشَطُونَ فِيهَا فَيُسْنِدُونَ الْخَبَرَ عَلَى هَيْئَةِ مَا سَمِعُوا فَيُخْبِرُونَ بِالنُّزُولِ فِيهِ إِنْ نَزَلُوا وَبِالصُّعُودِ إِنْ صَعِدُوا، كَمَا شَرَحْنَا ذَلِكَ عَنْهُمْ.
Translation: If the sole reason for rejecting a report without documented prior hearing is the possible omission of a link, the same reasoning would compel rejection even where the narrator is known to have heard from the teacher—except in a report explicitly stating its own hearing. Trustworthy scholars sometimes give abbreviated or fuller chains, with higher and lower routes.

This exposes the inconsistency of treating bare possibility as uniformly disqualifying while exempting cases of known general hearing. It does not assert that all trustworthy narrators actually omit links at every point.