The commentary fashions an apparently syllogistic movement from the beloved’s being a “moon” to the tearing of a garment. The surface may resemble inference, yet the premises are imaginative rather than established external facts.
Poetic image: “The beloved is the moon.”
Poetic association: “A garment fastened upon the moon tears.”
Imagined conclusion: “So the beloved’s garment is torn.”
It is not demonstration: the first premise is figurative, while the second relies on a fanciful connection. Their arrangement serves poetic impact.