Legal inference requires more than a lexical gloss. Wording, related verses, Prophetic explanation, generality and restriction, and reconciliation of evidence all matter. Grammar and rhetoric aid interpretation, but one should not choose a grammatical possibility solely because it supports a preferred legal conclusion.
Distinguish a supporting discipline from the governing proof. Where a clause admits multiple analyses, context and recognized usage help select among them; identifying rhetorical beauty must not displace the directive or claim itself.
When two legal conclusions are presented about one verse, set out the shared wording, then the reasoning and evidence for each interpretation. A disagreement in inference is not automatically a disagreement about the text.