Sectarian dispute over Qur’anic wording becomes problematic when verses are repeatedly bent to support a prior school position, objections are misrepresented, or an expression is pressed into a meaning it cannot reasonably carry.
The first obligation of argument is fidelity to revelation’s established wording and meaning. Legal or doctrinal preference should then be argued from relevant evidence. Beginning with a predetermined conclusion and reshaping the verse around it reverses the proper order.
Example: identifying a possible dictionary sense does not entitle someone to treat it as a conclusive argument against another school; syntax, context, and other texts still matter.