Accumulating large numbers of reports about occasions and interpretive problems does not guarantee sound exegesis. Some early collections linked almost every verse with a narrative, even though many such accounts may lack dependable transmission.
What matters is collecting reports that are both relevant and appropriately supported, using them to clarify meaning, and avoiding elaborate narratives that contribute little to interpretation.
Names such as Ibn Isḥāq, al-Wāqidī and al-Kalbī appear in the discussion of reported materials. Their presence in a chain or commentary is not itself a verdict on a claim: individual reports require scrutiny of transmission and content.