The second pattern occurs when low worldly pleasures become so dominant that love of God and His Messenger receives little effective place in a person's choices. The issue is not the mere enjoyment of lawful comfort; it is the domination of moral priorities by immediate appetite.
When duty and a tempting pleasure conflict, the decision reveals which was given practical priority. A declaration of love carries little moral weight if responsibilities are repeatedly surrendered whenever desire presses for satisfaction.
Important distinction: enjoying permissible blessings in moderation is one thing; allowing appetite to overrule obligations, trust or fairness is another. This difference is crucial to understanding the source's concern without treating ordinary worldly needs as inherently blameworthy.