Two groups of jurists hold different views but both imply exclusion of a proposed third outcome. Which topic is most relevant?

Advanced Applied Cases and Reasoning Assessment in Usul al-Shashi

• Composite consensus
• Tacit consensus, merely because there are two differing groups
• Absence of a differentiating view, since every two-view dispute is necessarily so
• Clear analogy, since every shared entailment is a form of analogy