A shared verbal label can suggest an unsound analogy. A word may have a broad everyday meaning but a technically restricted meaning in law. Ignoring that difference may generate an outcome that conflicts with the legally defined classification.
Order of investigation:
1. Identify the ordinary linguistic meaning.
2. Determine whether the relevant text or legal rule assigns a technical meaning.
3. Establish which legal attribute actually governs the proposed ruling.
Without the third step, similarity at the first step does not justify analogical extension.