Iqtiḍāʾ al-naṣṣ concerns an unspoken element that must be understood for the statement to make legal or rational sense. That necessity does not permit the interpreter to import every desired condition or consequence into the wording.
Where the coherence of a legal expression depends on implying a minimal prerequisite, accept only what is needed to make the statement meaningful and operative. Other legal consequences require separate grounds.
Limit: The principle that necessary implication is measured by necessity prevents over-expansion. Recognizing one indispensable implied element does not automatically confer unrelated rights or duties.