ولو قال: «تزوج امرأة» لا يتناول هذا تزوجها مرة بعد أخرى.
If someone says “Marry a woman,” the wording does not by itself require repeated marriage to the same person or repeated marriages generally.
Once the commanded act of marriage is validly performed, the bare requirement is satisfied. A later marriage would be a separate act assessed according to its own legal conditions, not the automatic continuation of the earlier imperative.
The meaning of the command must be distinguished from the possibility or permissibility of doing something again. An act's being legally possible on another occasion does not mean that a first command obliges repeated performance.
This example parallels the agency-divorce illustration: fulfilment is not identical to continuing authorization for an indefinite series of acts.