منع الحكم
Denial of the legal ruling assumed in the analogy.
An analogy concerning zakat argues that a specified financial duty is already established and therefore should not lapse when the property is subsequently lost. The opponent disputes whether the claimed continuing obligation has actually been established in the relevant circumstances, distinguishing the cause of obligation from the demand for performance.
The dispute is not settled by repeating the word “zakat.” One must identify the operative stage: initial liability, the relevant property condition, demand for payment, or subsequent loss. Different stages may carry different legal consequences.