Four Modes of Textual Indication: ʿIbārah, Ishārah, Dalālah and Iqtiḍāʾ
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- Which four modes comprise textual indication?
- What is the defining criterion of ʿibārat al-naṣṣ?
- What grounds the additional implication in ishārat al-naṣṣ?
- How is the emigrants’ entitlement established by “for the poor emigrants”?
- Deriving an implication about former ownership from the word “poor” exemplifies what?
- Which mode establishes the nighttime permissibility of marital intimacy?
- How is the non-invalidation of fasting by janābah at dawn established here?
- Which distinction concerning fasting and ghusl is correct?
- What is the key distinction in the fasting example about tasting?
- What is the Hanafi–Shafiʿi disagreement about intention in fasting?
- Which pair correctly distinguishes ʿibārah and ishārah?
- How is the reason known in dalālat al-naṣṣ?
- What common meaning extends the “uff” prohibition to hitting parents?
- What principally distinguishes dalālat al-naṣṣ from ordinary qiyās?
- What concern is evident in the restriction on trading at the Friday call?
- Which distinction remains relevant to a sale made at a prohibited time?
- What matters when interpreting “meat” in the cited oath example?
- What sort of unstated element is supplied by iqtiḍāʾ?
- What legal relationship is presupposed for “You are divorced” to operate?
- What does the stated price imply in the historical manumission example?
- What separates implied acceptance in a sale from physical possession in a gift?
- What rule is expressed by “measured to the extent of necessity”?
- Why cannot three divorces be inferred from “You are divorced” merely by iqtiḍāʾ?
- What is the limit of iqtiḍāʾ in the marital instruction “Observe the waiting period”?
- Which description correctly orders the four routes of proof?
- What must be verified before extending a rule through dalālat al-naṣṣ?
- Under ishārah, the discourse is directly framed to state that very implication.
- The validity of fasting and the need for ghusl before prayer are distinct legal issues.
- Dalālat al-naṣṣ always requires constructing a new analogical ratio.
- Iqtiḍāʾ may add unlimited unstated effects even when unnecessary for the text’s validity.