وحكم المؤول وجوب العمل به مع احتمال الخطأ
A preponderantly interpreted expression must be acted upon, while the possibility of error remains.
Two principles operate together: a well-supported probable interpretation is actionable, but it is not treated as though all possible error were eliminated by definitive clarification.
This is why reasoned preponderant probability (ẓann ghālib) differs from an unsupported guess. Muʾawwal depends on an evidential preference.
The distinction helps explain legitimate juristic disagreement: a conclusion can be binding for legal practice without the interpreter claiming infallible certainty.