وعلى المحرم باعتبار أن الدلالة محظور إحرامه.
The person in ihram incurs liability because pointing out game is itself prohibited by the restrictions of ihram.
If a person in ihram points out game to another and the latter kills it, this differs from an outsider merely providing information. Indicating the game is itself an independently prohibited act for the person in ihram. This creates a distinct ground for that person's liability even though someone else performs the actual killing.
The relevant financial consequence is established when the game is actually killed. Indication alone, without the subsequent killing, does not necessarily establish this particular compensation. The key distinction is between facilitating another person's action and violating a prohibition personally applicable to the facilitator.